|
||||||
   |
This is now my go-to Chili recipe. CHILI with dry beans in Instant PotIngredients1 cup each dried pinto & black beans 2 lbs ground beef 1-2 onions chopped 1 red & 1 yellow bell pepper chopped 2 Tbsp garlic minced 3 Tbsp chili powder 1 Tbsp dried oregano 2 tsp cumin powder 1 tsp salt or to taste 1/2 tsp black pepper 4 tsp beef broth concentrate Add after cooking: 1 can (14 oz.) diced tomatoes or 2 cups fresh tomatoes, chopped 1/4 cup masa harina e.g. Bob’s Red Mill brand Your choice of toppings: sour cream shredded cheddar cheese, chopped red onions, shallots or green onions, sliced jalapenos, hot sauce, diced avocado, or Fritos chips Instructions – To do a quick pre-soak of beans in Instant Pot:Rinse beans and drain. Place in instant pot and add 3 cups water. Close Lid, and make sure steam release handle is in the ‘Sealing’ position. Cook on ‘Manual’ or ‘Pressure Cook’ mode for 5 minutes. Do a Natural Pressure Release (NPR), about 12 minutes. Press ‘Cancel’ and open the Instant Pot.
Ladle chili into serving bowls and serve with your choice of toppings: sour cream, shredded cheddar cheese, chopped red onions, shallots or green onions, sliced jalapenos, hot sauce, diced avocado, or Fritos chips (my favorite!) Notes– Prep time does not include steps that are already accounted for in the ingredient list, e.g. chopped onions, minced garlic, diced chicken, etc. ** After 15 minutes, if you wish to, you can release the remaining pressure by moving the pressure release handle to venting position.
I have purchased three books with my pressure cooker and collected a number of recipes online. My GO TO weekly recipe, however is this one which I always made the rice on the stove top and had to cook the chicken separately.
Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Dear REMOVED, I want to provide you some very important information. I’m a committee member within the Liberal Party of Canada. I sit within several committee groups but the information I am providing is originating from the Strategic Planning committee (which is steered by the PMO). I need to start off by saying that I’m not happy doing this but I have to. As a Canadian and more importantly as a parent who wants a better future not only for my children but for other children as well. The other reason I am doing this is because roughly 30% of the committee members are not pleased with the direction this will take Canada, but our opinions have been ignored and they plan on moving forward toward their goals. They have also made it very clear that nothing will stop the planned outcomes. The road map and aim was set out by the PMO and is as follows: – Phase in secondary lock down restrictions on a rolling basis, starting with major metropolitan areas first and expanding outward. Expected by November 2020. Along with that provided road map the Strategic Planning committee was asked to design an effective way of transitioning Canadians to meet a unprecedented economic endeavor. One that would change the face of Canada and forever alter the lives of Canadians. What we were told was that in order to offset what was essentially an economic collapse on a international scale, that the federal government was going to offer Canadians a total debt relief. This is how it works: the federal government will offer to eliminate all personal debts (mortgages, loans, credit cards, etc) which all funding will be provided to Canada by the IMF under what will become known as the World Debt Reset program. In exchange for acceptance of this total debt forgiveness the individual would forfeit ownership of any and all property and assets forever. The individual would also have to agree to partake in the COVID-19 and COVID-21 vaccination schedule, which would provide the individual with unrestricted travel and unrestricted living even under a full lock down (through the use of photo identification referred to as Canada’s HealthPass) . Committee members asked who would become the owner of the forfeited property and assets in that scenario and what would happen to lenders or financial institutions, we were simply told “the World Debt Reset program will handle all of the details”. Several committee members also questioned what would happen to individuals if they refused to participate in the World Debt Reset program, or the HealthPass, or the vaccination schedule, and the answer we got was very troubling. Essentially we were told it was our duty to make sure we came up with a plan to ensure that would never happen. We were told it was in the individuals best interest to participate. When several committee members pushed relentlessly to get an answer we were told that those who refused would first live under the lock down restrictions indefinitely. And that over a short period of time as more Canadians transitioned into the debt forgiveness program, the ones who refused to participate would be deemed a public safety risk and would be relocated into isolation facilities. Once in those facilities they would be given two options, participate in the debt forgiveness program and be released, or stay indefinitely in the isolation facility under the classification of a serious public health risk and have all their assets seized. So as you can imagine after hearing all of this it turned into quite the heated discussion and escalated beyond anything I’ve ever witnessed before. In the end it was implied by the PMO that the whole agenda will move forward no matter who agrees with it or not. That it wont just be Canada but in fact all nations will have similar roadmaps and agendas. That we need to take advantage of the situations before us to promote change on a grander scale for the betterment of everyone. The members who were opposed and ones who brought up key issues that would arise from such a thing were completely ignored. Our opinions and concerns were ignored. We were simply told to just do it. All I know is that I don’t like it and I think its going to place Canadians into a dark future. Vancouver, Canada·Posted Today, October 14
or try this link to The World Economic Forum Agenda 2030 which supports the first one from Canada.
but the politicians running our country cannot. Jeremy Hammond is someone I I would have linked to his article but, knowing that Facebook allows no information that does not line up 100% with the accepted narrative, I am putting it up at my own website instead in the hopes that this information will reach you. This does not change my belief that 99% of people will survive it and that lockdowns are unconstitutional, unnecessary and have destroyed our economy and caused more harm than no interventions would have. This is what has changed my mind and you will find a link to his website in the article that follows: Since the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the “lockdown” responses, we’ve heard a lot about reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests. There’s a lot of confusion about these tests and plenty of misinformation, so here, briefly, is what you need to know. First, there are popular claims still being spread widely that the virus has never been proven to even exist. This is false. The virus has been isolated and its whole genome sequenced repeatedly by scientists all over the world. There are sequence databases scientists use to track evolutionary changes in the virus as it moves through the human population. There also seems to be a fairly widespread belief that PCR tests produce lots of false positives because they don’t discriminate between SARS-CoV-2 and viral RNA of common human coronaviruses, other viruses, or even human DNA. This is also untrue. The tests are specific to SARS-CoV-2 and will not return a positive result for other viruses, much less human DNA. What can cause false positives is contamination or other human error in handling or processing the tests. The tests work by cyclically amplifying any present SARS-CoV-2 RNA. If a certain cycle threshold value is met, the result is “positive”. If fewer cycles are required to reach the threshold, the inference is of a higher “viral load”; whereas if a greater number of cycles are required, the inference is that less viral RNA was present in the sample. I’ve seen the belief expressed many times that if the threshold value is set high enough, the tests will be positive no matter what. This is also incorrect. If there is no SARS-CoV-2 RNA present in the sample, there is nothing to amplify and so the result will be negative. Where the cycle threshold (or “Ct”) value really matters is in the implication with respect to contagiousness. The key point, which I have emphasized repeatedly in my writings over the past several months, is that the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is not necessarily indicative of the presence of viable, infectious virus. So when the New York Times and other media have reported, for example, that SARS-CoV-2 is airborne transmissible because such-and-such study found viral RNA in air samples, they were stating a fallacious conclusion. For another example, when they’ve said that children are contagious because they have “viral loads” at least as high as adults, they are stating a fallacious conclusion. Similarly, PCR tests are highly relevant for the shifted justification for extreme lockdown measures. These measures were originally sold to the public on the grounds they were temporarily required to “flatten the curve” and prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed. But then, the justification shifted and we were told that the measures must continue indefinitely to reduce “cases” to near zero. The number of “cases” in turn is dependent on the numbers of “positive” PCR tests. You may have seen the term “casedemic” being used to describe the situation, and while that term can also be misused, it legitimately calls attention to the problem of using PCR tests for diagnostic purposes and justifying policies based on “cases”. For example, how meaningful of a metric is an increasing number of “cases” when it’s a consequence of increased testing? How meaningful is it when hospitalizations and deaths are declining? The use of “cases” to justify lockdown measures is all the more absurd given the fact that a positive result does not even mean that “case” is infected with SARS-CoV-2. Again, all it means is that viral RNA was present in the sample. Even the pro-lockdown New York Times has admitted that 90% of people identified as “cases” by PCR testing were probably not contagious, as inferred from Ct values indicating low viral loads and a high likelihood of “positive” results indicating presence of non-viable RNA fragments as opposed to infectious virus. The appropriate threshold for positive PCR test results has not been determined scientifically. They are arbitrary, and the Times acknowledged that they the tests are wrongly being used to diagnose patients on the basis of threshold values that are too high. Also, even if a high “viral load” is inferred from Ct values, it still does not necessarily indicate the presence of infectious virus. For example, in one study, researchers were unable to detect viable virus (using cell cultures to see whether there are cytopathic effects and viral reproduction) after 8 days since symptom onset despite continued high viral loads as determined by PCR tests. In other words, there is not a perfect correlation between a high viral load and infectiousness. Another aspect of the testing regimes is the mathematical implication of false positives, especially in areas with low prevalence. If 1% of results falsely indicate the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA, then out of a tested population of 10,000 people, 100 people will be counted as “cases” even if there is no transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in that community. There can be a “casedemic” in areas of low prevalence just because there’s a massive amount of testing happening. So, to sum up, while PCR tests can be useful to confirm a diagnosis of COVID-19, they should never be used by themselves as a diagnostic tool. Yet, in “case” counts, that is precisely what’s been done: people who do not have the disease and are not contagious are being counted as COVID-19 “cases”, and these numbers in turn are being cited to justify continued lockdown measures. In my latest article, “New York Times Lies about Science to Push School Closures“, I discuss how policymakers and the media have misused, misinterpreted, and deceived about the meaning of PCR test results since the start of the pandemic to create fear and manufacture consent for extremely harmful lockdown measures. In case you haven’t read it yet: Jeremy R. Hammond Independent Journalist, Author, and Writing Coach
You see, there is/was another choice, one that might have saved our country, but you are not well informed. You see the world in only two dimensions, Left & Right. Since I know you have not, will not even have considered a third option, you should know what’s coming in our future. This guy paints the picture the way I see it, and he isn’t flattering of Trump, either. Yes, you could have voted Libertarian, the party for freedom, not the two who plan to enslave you. Below is a graphic to show you the third choice, the one you did not consider because you likely believe there is no chance she could win. However, if everyone who hates Trump and/or despises Biden voted for her, she would win, wouldn’t she. That isn’t a question, by the way. If you’d like a better look, here is a link to the graphic at the Idaho party website where I found it. There you will also find a link to a political quiz which has endless in-depth questions to determine your allegiance. Weirdly, my results there were 85% in agreement with Republicans, but the areas where I disagree are deal breakers: mandatory vaccination and lockdown and economic devastation for a virus that is 99% innocuous are two. And here is the shortest political quiz you can take to see where you stand on the important issues. Could be YOU are a LIBERTARIAN but didn’t know it!
This has more Pork Fat in it than Emeril Lagasse could use in a Lifetime!!! Hard to believe? Look it up on the Congressional website for HR 748 from 116th Congress. You might find these charts interesting, too. Saw this ad in my Facebook stream and wondered what this person was doing! So I checked it out and decided there was actually merit to it. And then, had to try it myself, but not forking out actual money for the product when I have a perfectly good roll of packing tape on hand!
I prefer sleeping on my side but my right shoulder hurts after a while so I switch to my left side until my left hip hurts too much, and next thing I’m on my back and you know what happens then! I have actually woken myself up with my own snoring, had such a dry mouth upon waking that my upper lip tore when I pulled it off my front tooth. So, I used a strip of packing tape trimmed to an appropriate size for several nights. The first thing that happens when applied is the need to yawn about 10 times. Now that piece won’t stick anymore. Each length of packing tape can be spit in two and hung near the bed (my lamp works well) for reapplications if needed. I find I am not waking up as many times a night, therefore I’m getting better sleep and feeling more rested in the mornings. It’s a little weird to get used to, but I think it is worth it. I know it looks really goofy but how much is a good night’s sleep worth?
There are other less expensive brands but they look a little different. Read on to see the claims of the advertisers. From the ad: Mouth breathing has serious implications, particularly during sleep–it often leads to:
Fortunately a solution is here: SomniFix Strips gently hold the mouth closed to direct airflow through the nose, reducing snores, improving sleep, and improving compliance with CPAP and oral appliances.      |
   |
||||
|
Copyright © 2021 Free Missy .com - All Rights Reserved Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa |
||||||
https://thecanadianreport.ca/is-this-leaked-memo-really-trudeaus-covid-plan-for-2021-you-decide/
know does his homework. I’m willing to accept, because it is from him, that Covid has been isolated, does exist and that the tests, within limitations he explains, do have some value.
What, didn’t know you could have voted for a WHITE WOMAN??? I am not racist, which will be the taunt from the Left, and I’m not a feminist, which will be the accusation from the Right. If you didn’t vote for Jo Jorgensen for president you missed an opportunity you will soon regret.
VIRUS STIMULUS BILL …Now you know why President Trump and Republicans 
