Bitterroot Amateur Radio

Bitterroot Amateur Radio

communicating through thick and thin

Fully Informed Jury

Fully Informed Jury

the alternative to a ruling elite

Libertarian Party

Libertarian Party

whatever floats your boat as long as it doesn't sink mine

Words to live by

Living in an Atomic Age (1948) by C.S. Lewis

“How are you to live in an atomic age? Why, just as you would have lived in the sixteenth century when the plague visited London almost every year, or as you would have lived in a Viking age when raiders from Scandinavia might land and cut your throat any night; or indeed, as you are already living in an age of cancer, an age of syphilis, an age of paralysis, an age of air raids, an age of railway accidents, an age of motor accidents.

In other words, do not let us begin by exaggerating the novelty of our situation. Believe me, dear sir or madam, you and all whom you love were already sentenced to death before the atomic bomb was invented: and quite a high percentage of us were going to die in unpleasant ways. We had, indeed, one very great advantage over our ancestors—anesthetics; but we have that still. It is perfectly ridiculous to go about whimpering and drawing long faces because the scientists have added one more chance of painful and premature death to a world which already bristled with such chances and in which death itself was not a chance at all, but a certainty.

This is the first point to be made: and the first action to be taken is to pull ourselves together. If we are all going to be destroyed by an atomic bomb, let that bomb when it comes find us doing sensible and human things—praying, working, teaching, reading, listening to music, bathing the children, playing tennis, chatting to our friends over a pint and a game of darts—not huddled together like frightened sheep and thinking about bombs. They may break our bodies, but they need not dominate our minds.”

Does a college education equal success?

Short video at PragerU

Does a college education equal success?

Jeremy Boreing, co-founder of The Daily Wire, doesn’t have a college degree. Neither do Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates, or a host of other innovators who have shaped our contemporary world. Which begs an important question: Is a college degree really necessary for success?

Covid vaccine trial results – side affects and need for quarterly injections in increased doses

Links (1 & 2) to in-depth results you should read. Most important is that multiple doses will be required and side affects will be your personal medical responsibility due to complete legal immunity granted to manufacturers. That, however, is nothing new. All vaccines have the same legal immunity.

1. Big Pharma achieves total legal immunity for coronavirus vaccines; even as vaccine injections will be FORCED onto billions of people, potentially killing tens of millions

2. Moderna coronavirus vaccine causes side effects in over 50% of patients; antibodies disappear in 2-3 months, rendering the vaccine pointless

Covid vaccine: From the horse’s mouth

From an article this am, for those believing that a vaccine is the magic bullet: “Additionally, the FDA is expecting that any vaccine will (ONLY) be at least 50% effective, and is “shooting” for a vaccine that is at least 70% effective, Axios reported, meaning that even

a successful vaccine MAY NOT directly help millions of Americans who receive it…..

But even if those hurdles are cleared and the drug can be distributed widely and effectively, there are still concerns that an insufficient number of Americans will be willing to take the vaccine, making it far less beneficial as a result.

Americans were already growing skeptical of vaccines even before the pandemic. A recent Associated Press/NORC poll found that 31% were uncertain whether they would receive a vaccination, while approximately 20% said they wouldn’t.”

Because, like me, they aren’t willing to be injected with materials from cancerous cells, aborted fetuses and experimental DNA altering chemicals.

“And on July 27, a trial led by the NIH and Moderna, a Massachusetts pharmaceutical company, began with 30,000 American volunteers, which, if successful, could be its final test.”

Realize, that means the results will be based on short term, not long term, so it’s a BIG gamble, IMO. But for those who trust Big Pharma, the AMA, WHO and whoever, to have your best interests at heart, not the financial gain they have received to develop this cocktail, be my guest. I will be watching for the long term affects of a DNA altering vaccine.

What is in The Vaccine? Links in the text.

People, when considering medical procedures, typically get a second opinion. I sincerely hope you will consider this doctor’s information your second opinion in regard to the new, UNTESTED vaccine being rolled out. You can watch her 23 minute video in the comfort of your home, at no cost. What a bargain! Is your personal health worth 23 minutes investment?

Ted will be referencing this material and related information at his website of news, analysis and commentary in the coming weeks. He will also be posting more videos like this at his honest, honorable, uncensored Brighteon channel.


I really hate Facebook censors and fact checkers and the entire idea that we cannot share ideas freely.


Luckily, I have my own website where I can post links to articles that give the opposing view, not the accepted narrative, like this one. Hydroxychloroquine

When, in the USA, that institutionalized elderly died at almost 30% until this drug was used, for instance in Texas by a Doctor Armstrong, who then reduced that to 2.6%, and that drug, with 65 years of use for malaria (among others) and side affects of visual blurring after 6-10 years of use, is then vilified by Fauci and followers (“causes blindness”), you have to wonder if they intend on killing people off by making it illegal to use, DON’T YOU????

THAT was a fabulous article. Admittedly, a tiny bit of profanity. So, world wide this cheap drug ($10 per patient) has increased recovery dramatically if used early or mid infection. USA negative results were from patients given only toward the end of infection, when nothing would have saved them. BECAUSE Big Pharma was launching their newest (untested) drug Remdesivir, which cost $10 to produce but patients were to be charged between $1,000 & $4,500 when prescribed. Results? They had to take “death” out of the equation, and said that it “speeded recovery” but apparently did not improve mortality. Well, safe to say if the majority are going to recover anyway, regardless of treatment. And the CDC flyer for use of the now banned drug.

Masking Children – unintended consequences

I cannot take credit for writing this, but I certainly am going to share it.

Something to be aware of! I would say a pretty good reason for children not to wear masks!

Imagine looking for a child in a sea of masks.

Do you know who this child is?

If you were on planet Earth during 2002-2003, you most certainly do. This is Elizabeth Smart.

Elizabeth was abducted at knife point from her own bed at age 14 by a monster couple, and hidden a few miles away from her home at a camping site in the mountains. She was brutally raped for 9 months, while the whole country was actively searching for her.

This is her at a party with her abductors. MASKED.

Everyone was searching for her. Nobody saw her.

This is NOT a mask debate. I’ve been watching thousands of you have this fight over the last month, I don’t want any part of it. I will not debate whether it violates one’s rights, or the efficacy of the mask. If that’s the direction you want to take this, whether for or against, take your fight elsewhere. Might I suggest your own page.

But…what I will say, is that our children are 66,667 times more likely to be trafficked than to succumb to covid 19.

Our Governor here in MT has mandated mask wearing for ALL children 5+.

And in a country where 421,394 kids went missing LAST YEAR (per the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children), I am far more concerned as a parent about the longterm fallout of empowering predators and removing children’s ability to be seen and effectively searched for.

When Elizabeth was masked, it was abnormal…it was strange. In fact, on a separate occasion Elizabeth was taken to a public library by her captors. A concerned caller alerted the police because Elizabeth’s striking blue eyes (the only thing visible while wearing her covering) convinced them that she was the missing girl all over the news. Detective Jon Richey investigated the situation, having an in depth conversation with the trio.

-Richey testified he had arrived at the library believing it was “a long shot” for anyone to recognize a person from his or her eyes alone. He said nothing that occurred during his 30 minutes at the library convinced him otherwise, and he left.-

Now imagine looking for 421,494 children in a sea of masked children.

Imagine an AMBER ALERT that says: AMBER ALERT issued in your county. Young girl is described as being 3′6″ with black hair and brown eyes, last seen wearing a black facemask.

You look at the picture of her beautiful little face…then look up from your phone, and see nothing but masked children. It’s mandated. Celebrated. Responsible. Normal.

800,000 children go missing every single year worldwide. Children that desperately need to be seen, and found. I won’t argue the efficacy of masking, or whether it’s your right to refuse it.

But, I will leave you with this…

…if children are statistically more likely to be abducted/trafficked/victimized than to die of covid, why are we masking them?

For their safety? Or ours?

If you’re a concerned parent, I suggest you call and write your local leaders. Keep the issue focused, don’t get stuck in the weeds.

VOICE your concern for the “new normal” we’re allowing. Ask for common sense policies that take into consideration the potential long term fallout from any short term policy solution.

For Montanans:

Governor Steve Bullock
PO Box 200801
Helena MT 59620-0801

By phone:
Toll Free: 855-318-1330

SHARE this post to raise awareness, if you feel led.

Copy the text and download the pics to share as original content with YOUR leader’s contact info.

And please lead and respond with kindness. Always.

Covid tests validity

Manufactured Pandemic: Testing People for Any Strain of a Coronavirus, Not Specifically for COVID-19

Excerpts rom the article:

First published by Global Research on March 27, 2020

The following is from a medical forum. The writer, who is a widely respected professional scientist in the US, prefers to stay anonymous, because presenting any narrative different than the official one can cause you a lot of stress in the toxic environment caused by the scam which surrounds COVID-19 these days. – Julian Rose


I work in the healthcare field. Here’s the problem, we are testing people for any strain of a Coronavirus. Not specifically for COVID-19. There are no reliable tests for a specific COVID-19 virus. There are no reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual COVID-19 virus cases. This needs to be addressed first and foremost. Every action and reaction to COVID-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply can not make accurate assessments.

This is why you’re hearing that most people with COVID-19 are showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. The few actual novel Coronavirus cases do have some worse respiratory responses, but still have a very promising recovery rate, especially for those without prior issues.

The ‘gold standard’ in testing for COVID-19 is laboratory isolated/purified coronavirus particles free from any contaminants and particles that look like viruses but are not, that have been proven to be the cause of the syndrome known as COVID-19 and obtained by using proper viral isolation methods and controls (not the PCR that is currently being used or Serology /antibody tests which do not detect virus as such). PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome.

The problem is the test is known not to work.

It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery.

Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.

The Mickey Mouse test kits being sent out to hospitals, at best, tell analysts you have some viral DNA in your cells. Which most of us do, most of the time. It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.


Everyone will have a few virus kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it. But PCR does not test viral load and therefore can’t determine if it is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you.

They can not “confirm” something for which there is no accurate test.

The original source of this article is Global Research.

PLEASE use the link and read the article. It isn’t very long and I don’t want to infringe on the copyright.


Vaccines didn’t save humanity

Here is a great article with excellent sources. Excerpts from the article:

Published in 1977 in The Millbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, the McKinlay’s study was titled, “The Questionable Contribution of Medical Measures to the Decline of Mortality in the United States in the Twentieth Century.” The study clearly proved, with data, something that the McKinlay’s acknowledged might be viewed by some as medical “heresy.” Namely:

“that the introduction of specific medical measures and/or the expansion of medical services are generally not responsible for most of the modern decline in mortality.”

By “medical measures,” the McKinlay’s really meant ANYTHING modern medicine had come up with, whether that was antibiotics, vaccines, new prescription drugs, whatever. The McKinlay’s 23-page study really should be read cover to cover, but in a nutshell the McKinlay’s sought to analyze how much of an impact medical interventions (antibiotics, surgery, vaccines) had on this massive decline in mortality rates between 1900 and 1970:


Vaccines didn’t save humanity. Their impact was somewhere between 1-3.5% of the total decline in mortality rates. Improvement in sanitation and standards of living really did (nutrition, living conditions, etc.). Did vaccines contribute to a small decrease of certain acute illnesses? Yes, but their relative benefit is often exaggerated to an extreme, and then used to browbeat, guilt, and scare parents.

So am I saying no one should vaccinate? No, I’m not. Vaccines provide temporary protection from certain acute illnesses. Some matter more than others. I personally think we give way too many vaccines, and I think the risk/benefit equation of each vaccine is often obscured. Worse, the lie that vaccines saved humanity in the twentieth century has turned many vaccine promoters into zealots, even though their narratives are simply not supported by the facts. But, by all means, get as many vaccines as you want, I respect your right to make your own medical care choices.

In late 2017, it was reported that Emory University scientists were developing a common cold vaccine. Professor Martin Moore bragged that his research “takes 50 strains of the common cold and puts it into one shot” and that the monkeys who served as test subjects “responded very well.” You should expect to see this vaccine at your pediatrician’s office in the next five years, which will likely be rolled out soon after the stories start to appear in the media about the common cold causing childhood deaths, and that millions of lives will be saved, much as vaccines saved the world in the twentieth century…parents beware, and do your own research!


New Days of the Week and Covid data reviewed

Love meeting my siblings on Zoom each week!

In the spirit of protests and political correctness I offer to change the days of the week to the following because that’s the best day of the week and should say so.

And… I am so proud of a local group: Stand Together For Freedom and the document they submitted to our county commissioners in response to our county health officer resigning. Mind you she wants all her benefits, but not the job. Anyway, I hope you will take the time to read it because you may need to take similar action in your counties.

Hint: click on the blue text “document” above to view the pdf.

I hope you will also listen to this 14 minute video on the Covid data.

By now, almost everyone knows that the fatality rate and even the infection rate of COVID-19 is outrageously exaggerated. If there is any lingering doubt in your mind about this, her latest additions to the existing mountain of evidence should remove it. The second part of Dr. Popper’s analysis is even more important because it deals with what lies ahead, and that reveals the motive for faking the pandemic in the first place. This is one clear-headed and fearless lady. 2020 July 23 – Source: Pamela Popper

Click on the blue “video” text above to view video. 

This is the source for the video.

and you will find this message there:


Our videos were disabled last month by Vimeo because of our skeptical view of the pandemic. We quickly found a way to re-activate them without Vimeo or YouTube, but this requires uploading many video files, and the process is slow. Meanwhile, if you see “Sorry, this video does not exist”, click on “Source” below the video and you likely will find what you seek. 

Try this link:

Fake COVID Data & What Lies Ahead Because of it

If this link doesn’t work, let us know, and Ted is using to upload videos and will add it here