I really hate Facebook censors and fact checkers and the entire idea that we cannot share ideas freely.
Luckily, I have my own website where I can post links to articles that give the opposing view, not the accepted narrative, like this one. Hydroxychloroquine
When, in the USA, that institutionalized elderly died at almost 30% until this drug was used, for instance in Texas by a Doctor Armstrong, who then reduced that to 2.6%, and that drug, with 65 years of use for malaria (among others) and side affects of visual blurring after 6-10 years of use, is then vilified by Fauci and followers (“causes blindness”), you have to wonder if they intend on killing people off by making it illegal to use, DON’T YOU????
THAT was a fabulous article. Admittedly, a tiny bit of profanity. So, world wide this cheap drug ($10 per patient) has increased recovery dramatically if used early or mid infection. USA negative results were from patients given only toward the end of infection, when nothing would have saved them. BECAUSE Big Pharma was launching their newest (untested) drug Remdesivir, which cost $10 to produce but patients were to be charged between $1,000 & $4,500 when prescribed. Results? They had to take “death” out of the equation, and said that it “speeded recovery” but apparently did not improve mortality. Well, safe to say if the majority are going to recover anyway, regardless of treatment. And the CDC flyer for use of the now banned drug.
